Testing that catches regressions, not typos
A suite scoped to the paths that lose money when they break, run on every push.
What you get
- Test strategy and coverage targets
- Unit and integration suites
- End-to-end tests on critical paths
- CI pipeline integration
- Regression and release checklists
What changes
- A broken checkout fails the build instead of reaching a customer
- Releases stop needing a manual click-through
- Refactoring becomes safe enough to actually do
When teams call us
- Every release followed by a day of firefighting
- A codebase nobody will refactor because nothing verifies it
- A team that wants to ship weekly but tests by hand
Process
How the work runs
The same four phases whichever engagement model you pick, each ending in something you can read.
Discovery
A short paid engagement that turns the ambition into a scope somebody can build and estimate.
- Written scope
- Estimate with assumptions
- Risk register
Design & architecture
Interface and data model settled before the first feature, because both are expensive to change afterwards.
- Prototype
- Data model
- Decisions recorded
Build
Two-week iterations against a board you can see, with a deployed environment from week one rather than week twelve.
- Fortnightly demo
- Staging from week one
- Your repository
Launch & handover
Release, monitoring, and documentation good enough that your own team can take it from here.
- Runbooks
- Alerts configured
- Handover sessions
QA & Test Automation, specifically
The questions that come up on this work in particular.
Still have a question? Talk to the team
Not sure which service your project needs?
Most useful projects cross two or three of them. Describe the outcome and we will map it.